Difference between revisions of "Previous weeks"
(→Previous Semesters) |
|||
Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
[[:Image:27thAug10_2.pdf | Supp]] | [[:Image:27thAug10_2.pdf | Supp]] | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Sep 03rd''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h4> Integrating dorsal and ventral hippocampus </h4> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Speaker : [http://schweizerlab.org/gina-rinetti Gina Rinetti ] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Summary:Although the anatomical structure of the hippocampus is preserved along its septo-temporal axis, increasing evidence suggests that the septal (dorsal) and temporal (ventral) regions have different functions and project to different structures. Importantly, most studies focus on specific physiological aspects of the hippocampus such as learning and memory, LTP, space recognition (place cells, grid cells, etc), or emotion without integrating the findings within an anatomical context. Royer et al., J neuroscience 2010 (original paper) and Fanselow and Dong, Neuron 2010 (review), have been able to reconcile many of these functions in an elegant anatomical model. | ||
+ | |||
+ | My talk will focus mainly on the paper by Royer et al., in which the authors characterize the striking differences between place cells in dorsal and ventral CA3 areas. In general, dorsal pyramidal neurons are able to represent the environment better and display more precise temporal dynamics, compared to ventral pyramidal cells. An examination of these findings will be discussed in the context of hippocampal anatomy and integrative physiology. This discussion will be complemented with some examples from Fanselow and Dong. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Relevant Paper: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[:Image:03rdSep10_1.pdf | Paper 1]] | ||
+ | [[:Image:03rdSep10_2.pdf | Paper 2]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
== Previous Semesters == | == Previous Semesters == |
Revision as of 17:58, 9 September 2010
Contents
- 1 Summer 2010:
- 1.1 Cortical methylation maintains remote memory
- 1.2 Activity-dependent nuclear translocation from synapse to nucleus of the Transducer of Regulated CREB 1(TORC1)/CREB Regulated Transcriptional Co-activator 1 (CRTC1)
- 1.3 Metaplasticity at Single Synapses
- 1.4 The reorganization and reactivation of hippocampal maps predict spatial memory performance
- 1.5 Lateral and laminar flow of information in cortical circuits.
- 1.6 BDNF substitutes for fear extinction
- 1.7 GABA is it purely inhibitory
- 1.8 Integrating dorsal and ventral hippocampus
- 2 Previous Semesters
Summer 2010:
Jun 25th
Cortical methylation maintains remote memory
Speaker: Justin Shobe
Summary of the talk:
Relevant Paper :
Jul 09th
Activity-dependent nuclear translocation from synapse to nucleus of the Transducer of Regulated CREB 1(TORC1)/CREB Regulated Transcriptional Co-activator 1 (CRTC1)
Speaker : Kelsey Martin
Summary of the talk :
Relevant Paper :
Jul 30th
Metaplasticity at Single Synapses
Speaker: Adam Frank
Summary of the talk: Neuronal activity is known to modify NMDA receptor subunit composition; and, NMDAR subunit composition has significant effects on NMDAR synaptic currents. Given the importance of the NMDAR in the induction of LTP it is not surprising that altering NMDAR currents, by altering subunit composition, has demonstrated effects on the induction of LTP. Lee et al. now demonstrate these phenomena at the level of single synapses in cultured hippocampal neurons: altering spontaneous activity changes the ratio of NR2B to NR2A subunits and effects both NMDAR synaptic current as well as LTP induction threshold. These findings are presented in the context of metaplasticity, where prior activity at a synapse effects the subsequent ability of the synapse to undergo plasticity.
Relevant Paper :
Aug 06th
The reorganization and reactivation of hippocampal maps predict spatial memory performance
Speaker: Walt Babiec
Summary: The hippocampus has place cells that preferentially fire at a particular location of spatial arena. Dupret et al. report that place fields remapped as a result of goal-directed spatial learning and that sharp wave/ripple reactivation events seen during memory consolidation predicted the strength of subsequent spatial memory.
Relevant Paper :
Aug 13th
Lateral and laminar flow of information in cortical circuits.
Speaker: Dean Buonomano
Summary: The basic flow of activity through cortical circuits is not understood, nor is the computational function of each step in the cortical circuit. It is known that lateral interactions play two critical roles: sharing information between neighboring areas and, conversely, competition through lateral inhibition. This paper from the Scanziani lab shows that both lateral competition and facilitation can be observed in vivo and in vitro.
Relevant Paper:
Aug 20th
BDNF substitutes for fear extinction
Speaker: Ravi Ponnusamy
Summary: Not provided
Relevant Paper:
Aug 27th
GABA is it purely inhibitory
Speaker : Shlomo Dellal
Summary: GABA is generally regarded as an inhibitory neurotransmitter in the adult CNS. However, in recent years, an excitatory role for GABA has been found in several brain regions. In this week’s LMP journal club, Shlomo Dellal will discuss a paper from the Rusakov and Kullman laboratories, in which they report that δ subunit containing GABAA receptors are expressed in presynaptic hippocampal mossy fiber boutons, where they enhance synaptic transmission and can facilitate LTP induction.
Relevant Paper:
Sep 03rd
Integrating dorsal and ventral hippocampus
Speaker : Gina Rinetti
Summary:Although the anatomical structure of the hippocampus is preserved along its septo-temporal axis, increasing evidence suggests that the septal (dorsal) and temporal (ventral) regions have different functions and project to different structures. Importantly, most studies focus on specific physiological aspects of the hippocampus such as learning and memory, LTP, space recognition (place cells, grid cells, etc), or emotion without integrating the findings within an anatomical context. Royer et al., J neuroscience 2010 (original paper) and Fanselow and Dong, Neuron 2010 (review), have been able to reconcile many of these functions in an elegant anatomical model.
My talk will focus mainly on the paper by Royer et al., in which the authors characterize the striking differences between place cells in dorsal and ventral CA3 areas. In general, dorsal pyramidal neurons are able to represent the environment better and display more precise temporal dynamics, compared to ventral pyramidal cells. An examination of these findings will be discussed in the context of hippocampal anatomy and integrative physiology. This discussion will be complemented with some examples from Fanselow and Dong.
Relevant Paper: